Eternity Law International — News — Payment license for e-commerce marketplace

Payment license for e-commerce marketplace

Published:
October 17, 2023

Amidst the ever-shifting landscape of e-commerce, a diverse array of market participants has emerged, ranging from industry titans exemplified by eBay to niche innovators typified by Asos.com. These visionary entities have meticulously curated their market positions, promising not only substantial expansion but also attracting discerning venture capitalists.

Within this dynamic context, the European Payment Services Directive, known as PSD1, has brought forth a pressing matter. This concern revolves around an exclusion mechanism fervently sought by a select cohort of e-commerce marketplaces. This mechanism confers upon them the authority to operate as intermediaries in payment transactions, adroitly circumventing the complexities of obtaining a payment institution license. At its core, this exclusion centers on financial transactions instigated by a payer, conventionally the buyer, and directed toward a payee, typically the seller or merchant. These financial transactions are orchestrated with the intermediation of a commercial agent, often personified by the marketplace operator. This designated commercial agent is duly empowered to engage in negotiations or conclude transactions on behalf of either the payer or the payee, a statutory provision expounded within Article 3(b) of PSD1, popularly denoted as the “Commercial Agent Exclusion.”

A pivotal tenet of the Commercial Agent Exclusion stipulates that the intermediary, typically embodied by the marketplace operator, is obligated to serve exclusively as a commercial agent for either the facilitation of negotiations or the finalization of transactions, rather than performing both functions concurrently. The prevalent interpretation of this exclusion appears to be accommodating e-commerce marketplace providers who have intricately structured their operational framework to function as commercial agents for their clientele, proficiently overseeing financial transactions. This operational paradigm usually empowers the party initiating financial disbursements, generally the buyer, to fulfill their financial obligations to the ultimate recipient of these funds, often the seller, once the funds have been received by the commercial agent.

However, despite the considerable interest and reliance on the Commercial Agent Exclusion by various marketplaces, securing universal acceptance among regulatory bodies within the European Union has proven to be an arduous endeavor. Significantly, the German regulatory authority, BaFin, has publicly voiced reservations about its application, leading to a conspicuous schism within the EU concerning the eligibility of operators to avail themselves of this exclusionary provision.

This quandary lies at the core of the impending PSD2, an iteration of PSD1. This proposed modification, dating back to June 2, 2015, endeavors to redefine the Commercial Agent Exclusion, substantially narrowing its purview. It restricts the exclusion solely to payment transactions initiated by the payer and directed exclusively toward the payee. Such transactions must be exclusively conducted through a commercial agent explicitly authorized to negotiate or conclude the sale or purchase of goods or services on behalf of either the payer or the payee. This revision is explicated within draft Article 3(b) and introduces a pivotal proviso:

“The Directive shall not apply to any of the following… payment transactions from the payer to the payee through a commercial agent authorized to negotiate or conclude the sale or purchase of goods or services on behalf of only the payer or only the payee.”

This conundrum is at the heart of the upcoming PSD2, an iteration of PSD1. This proposed change, which dates back to June 2, 2015, seeks to modify the Commercial Agent Exclusion, significantly restricting its scope. It limits the exclusion to payment transactions initiated by the payer and aimed solely towards the payee. Such transactions must be carried out solely through a commercial representative who has been expressly authorized to negotiate or consummate the sale or purchase of goods or services on behalf of either the payer or the payee. This amendment is explained in draft Article 3(b) and includes a critical provision:

“The variation in the implementation of the payment transactions exemption, as specified in Directive 2007/64/EC, is conspicuous across different Member States. Some states permit e-commerce platforms, serving as intermediaries for individual buyers and sellers, to avail themselves of this exemption, even when there is an evident dearth of substantial negotiation or transaction conclusion margins. This extends beyond the intended purview of the exemption, heightening potential risks to consumers, as these service providers operate outside the protective aegis of the legal framework. Furthermore, these incongruous application practices have the potential to distort the competitive dynamics within the payment market.”

  • In response to these apprehensions, a clarifying directive is mandated, stipulating that the exemption’s applicability hinges on agents acting exclusively on behalf of either the payer or the payee, irrespective of their custodial responsibilities concerning clients’ funds. In cases where agents represent both the payer and the payee, a practice observed in certain e-commerce platforms, the granting of exemption status is contingent upon their refraining from custodianship of clients’ funds at any point.
  • The reference to the misuse of the commercial agent exclusion by e-commerce platforms in the aforementioned recital implies that such operators should not fully exploit this exemption, particularly when they do not generate a significant margin through negotiations or transaction completion.
  • Evidently, the pivotal criterion of a “real margin” has become central in determining eligibility for the exemption. Unfortunately, this criterion remains conspicuously absent within the language of the draft revised exclusion itself, leading to a palpable sense of ambiguity regarding the precise qualifications for eligibility. This uncertainty prompts questions about whether a typical e-commerce marketplace provider can avail itself of this exemption without completely refraining from managing client funds.

The approach taken by PSD2 raises numerous unanswered questions and, somewhat disconcertingly, may not effectively foster innovation in this domain. There is a fervent hope within the industry that the precise scope and parameters of the commercial agent exclusion will be definitively delineated as PSD2 is integrated into the legislative framework of individual EU Member States, supported by regulatory guidance. This clarity is much needed to effectively navigate this intricate landscape.

You could be interested

Foreх broker licensе in Bulgariа

Gone are the days when only multinational companies with an almost unlimited budget could apply for and obtain a financial licensе in a respected jurisdiction (eg EU, US, Canada, etc.). Today, an increasing number of conventional companies are obtaining financial licensеs, armed with a well-thought-out concept and a sustainable business model. While obtaining financial licensеs...

UK parliamentary group initiates new crypto asset inquiry

Recently, the cross-party group of UK parliamentarians (ΑPPG) made a notification that it will kickstart a new crypto asset inquiry scrutinizing the cryptocoin and virtual asset field. The statement encompassed detailed description about the initiative’s plan of action and how stakeholders can take part in the process. Overview of the crypto asset inquiry in the United Kingdom By...

DAO registration

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations are communities that belong to organizations without centralized leadership. This is an opportunity to safely collaborate with strangers in the online space. Such organizations work through venture capital funds with cryptocurrencies, and their main goal is the ability to reduce costs, control over operations, and access for investors. Such organizations became especially...

Company registration in South Africa

South Africa is a jurisdiction that contributes to bringing business to the international level in the shortest possible time and offers favorable conditions for optimizing the tax burden. In this country, it is profitable to conduct a business related to the export and import of goods, since there is no tax duty on capital increases,...

Malaysia 6th largest public listed bank for sale

Bank’s total asset is RM130 B, normal foreigner is 20%, in this special case, foreigner can hold 24%. Malaysian will hold 12,7%. 12.7% can be put to buyer custody until loan are pay back in 2-3 year. As single biggest shareholder of 36.7%, both can joint manage the bank. please appoint me as your notary,...

Mobile banking system development

Banking sector institutions have long mastered the online space. Banks can serve customers over the Internet much faster than at branches. The benefits of remote service are obvious and people will immediately appreciate it. Users began to actively pay for services remotely, make money transfers and make purchases. With the advent of telephones, Internet banking...

Discover our services

The international company Eternity Law International provides professional services in the field of international consulting, auditing services, legal and tax services.

Ready-made companies for sale

Companies with a bank account around the world

Banks for sale

Established Banks for sale

Ready-made licenses for sale

Forex, cryptocurrencies, gambling, EMI, PSP, SVF, MSO, DLT

Licensing

Forex licenses, cryptocurrencies, gambling, EMI, PSP, SVF, MSO, DLT

Offshore company registration

Expert advice on the acquisition of an offshore company

Open a bank account

Open bank accounts in more than 120 banks around the world
Fill the blank:

Zurich

Dreikonigstrasse, 31A, Stockerhof
+41 435 50 73 23

Kyiv

Baseina street, 7
+38 094 712 03 54

London

Grosvenor Gardens, 52
+44 203 868 34 37

Washington

1629 K St. Suite 300 N.W.
+1 (888) 647 05 40 Toll Free

Vilnius

Gediminas Avenue, 44A
+370 52 11 14 32

Tallinn

Kesklinna linnaosa, Tuukri 19
+372 880 41 85

Edinburgh

Lochrin Square, 1
+44 203 868 34 37

Nicosia

Jacovides Tower, 5 floor
+371 665 550 51

Riga

Esplanade, 7 floor
+371 665 550 51

Hong Kong

18 Harbour Road, 35/F, Central Plaza, Wanchai
800938622 Toll Free

Singapore

Level 42, Suntec Tower Three, 8 Temasek Boulevard
+6531594300

Sydney

20 Martin Place
+61 2 888 00 365

Porto

2609 Avenida da Boavista
+351 800 500 206 Toll Free

Tbilisi

Revaz Tabukashvili Str., N 45, area N 7
+995706070360